Dylan Tan Industrial Designer & Product Manager

Project 05 of 36

Entice HP+ (Transom & Sidelites)

Company
C.R. Laurence
Role
Product manager, stage-gate lead
Year
2025
Discipline
Entrance systems
Status
Gate 3 complete, May 2025
Images
8

Architects kept asking for Entice HP+ with sidelites and transoms, and without them we were losing specifications. On one large government campus, HP+ was the basis of design, and the job went to a competitor because we couldn't support a sidelite.

We developed transom and sidelite framing members that keep HP+'s weather and thermal performance, ran full assembly testing for air, water, structural and racking loads, wrote the installation manuals, and took the program from Gate 0 to Gate 3 in two months.

Projects that need a transom or sidelite
14.6%
Gate 0 to Gate 3
2 mo.
Structural load with negligible permanent set
45 psf
U.S. commercial door market, 2023
<$10B

Overview

Problem

Without sidelites and transoms, HP+ lost projects to competitors whenever an entrance needed them.

Solution

Transom and sidelite framing members that broaden HP+'s architectural applications while keeping its weather and thermal performance.

Customers

Primary: mid-size commercial architecture firms that want bold, code-compliant entries. Secondary: glaziers who want a complete entrance from one supplier.

Value

The complete HP+ entrance: monumental doors with matching transoms and sidelites, without sacrificing performance.

Manufacturing

Built in-house at CRL's Los Angeles plant and made to order, so no new inventory is held.

Competition

FHC Aspire, Assa Abloy ThermaGuard, U.S. Aluminum Mojave 250T.

My role

I led this program from Gate 0 to Gate 3 in two months: making the case from lost projects and the open HP+ pipeline, defining the framing members with engineering, coordinating full-assembly testing, and getting installation manuals and SKUs set up for made-to-order production.

Stakeholders I coordinated

Testing
Air, water, structural and racking assembly tests
Manufacturing
Los Angeles plant, made to order
Internal teams
New product development · Product testing · Marketing · Sales and service centers · Sourcing and purchasing · Demand planning · Master data
Gate committee
VP Engineering · VP Product Design & Development · VP Sales · VP Marketing · Head of Product & Innovation

Stage-gate progress

  1. G0 Concept Mar 2025
  2. G1 Define Mar 2025
  3. G2 Develop Apr 2025
  4. G3 Validate May 2025
  5. G5 Post-launch Planned

Research

Fig. R01

How original Entice projects were configured

Based on original Entice orders. We expected the same share of HP+ projects to need a transom or sidelite, a lift of about 14.6% on the open pipeline.

  • 85.4%Door only
  • 9.8%With sidelites
  • 4.8%With transom
Fig. R02

Open HP+ opportunities by construction type

33 open or won projects. More than half are renovations, where matching an existing opening with sidelites and transoms matters most.

  • 55%Renovation
  • 42%New construction
  • 3%Addition
Fig. R03

Assembly test results

Entice HP+ door with one sidelite, 98-3/16" × 122-15/16", tested on the air, water and structural test wall.

TestMethodResult
Air infiltration at 1.57 psfASTM E2830.22 cfm/ft²
Air exfiltration at −1.57 psfASTM E2830.15 cfm/ft²
Water penetration, limited waterASTM E331No water penetration
Deflection at ±25.1 psf, center mullionASTM E330+0.561" / −0.699"
Deflection at ±30.1 psf, center mullionASTM E330+0.679" / −0.786"
Permanent set at ±45.1 psfASTM E330<0.01" / −0.13"
Vertical load (racking), 250 lbfAAMA 925Pass: 0.068" peak, 0.028" permanent

Situational analysis

SStrengths

  • Adds sidelites and transoms, closing HP+'s biggest gap
  • Keeps its industry-leading thermal and weather ratings
  • Full entrance systems strengthen spec appeal
  • Built in-house for quality control

WWeaknesses

  • Development and testing investment
  • Only one assembly tested (door plus one sidelite); broader validation may be needed
  • Made to order, so availability depends on production capacity

OOpportunities

  • Win back projects that went to competitors
  • Give architects more freedom without sacrificing performance
  • Few systems combine premium aesthetics and thermal performance in one package

TThreats

  • Competitors may move quickly to match or undercut
  • Specifiers may wait for documentation and proof points
Next project Fallbrook CTL Program